By Dave Ranney and Mike Shields, KHI News Service, May 11, 2010

House Assistant Sergeant at Arms Terry Lohrbach delivers freshly
printed copies of the Feuerborn amendment to members of the
House as they prepared for debate on the budget alternative
crafted by Democrats and moderate Republicans. The amendment
became the final budget plan adopted by both the House
and the Senate. (Photo by Dave Ranney)
TOPEKA — After four months of struggling with the issues of budgets and taxes, the Legislature finished its work today and concluded all but the ceremonial end of the 2010 session.
Final spending plan
The final spending plan for the fiscal year that begins July 1 calls for expenditures of $13.6 billion, significantly less than the $14.4 billion budget of fiscal 2010, which got pumped up more than $1.1 billion thanks mostly to extra federal unemployment payments funneled through the Department of Labor.
Of the $13.6 billion approved by the Legislature for fiscal 2011, $5.6 billion would come from the State General Fund, which covers general services such as K-12 and higher education and the state’s share of social services such as Medicaid.
General fund spending approved by this year’s Legislature was significantly less than the record $6.1 billion of fiscal 2009 but more than the $5.4 billion of 2010 when agency budgets were cut by the governor after the Legislature left town because of shortfalls in tax collections due to the weak economy.
State general fund spending has increased between 4.1 and 9.6 percent in all but four of the past 10 years, usually outpacing growth in Kansas personal income and the Consumer Price Index. In fiscal 2010, however, that spending was reduced almost 9 percent, the biggest retreat in at least 60 years.
Avoiding more cuts
The governor was eager to make up for some of those recent spending cuts. He began the legislative session recommending $13.8 billion in total spending, $5.8 billion from the general fund. The only way to do that was to raise taxes. He proposed a 1 cent sales tax increase and about $50 million in additional tobacco taxes.
"We attempted to start out making cuts that were painful but not crippling. I think we’re to a point now where we’ve made cuts that are potentially crippling," Gov. Mark Parkinson, a Democrat, told KHI News Service about a month before he presented his budget and tax plans to the Legislature in January and soon after announcing yet another round of cuts to state programs, including a 10 percent reduction in the reimbursement rate to Medicaid providers.
The governor's call for more taxes put him immediately at odds with conservative Republicans in the Legislature who wanted to avoid any new levies. The House has elections this year and resistance there was strongest. House GOP leaders came up with a budget plan that called for $519 million less in spending than the governor proposed but it was understood from the outset that their spending list lacked political traction because it would have meant less money for state employees and schools, both core constituencies for Democrats.
The House GOP leadership budget would have cut state worker pay 5 percent, would have ignored the governor’s proposed $50 increase in per-pupil base state aid to K-12 schools and also would not have replaced about $172 million in disappearing federal stimulus dollars used to plug a hole in the education budget this fiscal year.
Divided Republicans
Republicans, numerically superior in both the House and the Senate, were too divided in either chamber to do anything without the Democrats and so it was no coincidence that the final budget for a while was called the "Feuerborn amendment," for Rep. Bill Feuerborn of Garnett, the ranking Democrat on the House Appropriations Committee who carried the measure during House floor debate.

Rep. Bill Feuerborn, D-Garnett, ranking Democrat on the
House Appropriations Committee lent his name to the
budget plan that displaced one favored by House GOP leaders.
(Photo by Dave Ranney)
Moderate and even some conservative Republicans couldn’t tolerate the spending plans GOP conservative leaders had for K-12 schools, including late-hatched proposals that would have expanded local authority to increase property taxes for schools.
Critics said doing that would simply shift more of the state’s financial responsibility for schools onto local school boards. In many rural districts, where property values are generally declining and more and more people live on fixed incomes, raising property taxes was less palatable to legislators than increasing the state sales tax.
Sen. Ralph Ostmeyer, R-Grinnell, a Senate GOP conservative, grew emotional explaining why he couldn’t vote with fellow conservatives on the budget. He said their plan would decimate schools in his sprawling western Kansas district, where enrollment continues to decline as the population shrinks and ages.
What the Legislature ultimately approved was a budget that split the difference between the governor’s plan and the one called for by GOP conservatives.
The “Feuerborn amendment,” which closely resembled the budget plan approved earlier by a coalition of Democrats and moderate Republicans in the Senate, would spend about $212 million less than the governor had recommended but about $307 million more than hoped for by GOP conservatives, who for the second year in a row perhaps had some broad directional input on state budget priorities but left few fingerprints on the final plan.
Democrats and mostly moderate Republicans also came together on the bill to increase the state sales tax by 1 percent to 6.3 percent effective July 1.

Members of the House had a couple of nights during the
veto session when they worked past 2 a.m. Yawns were
common early Tuesday as the House voted on the
tax plan needed to fund its budget. In the foreground is
Rep. Dan Kerschen, R-Garden Plain. Behind him is
Rep. Dave Crum, R-Augusta. (Photo by Dave Ranney)
In the private leadership meetings that laid the groundwork for the session's conclusion, House GOP leaders were excluded. Instead, those who charted the course were Senate President Steve Morris, R-Hugoton; Senate Vice President John Vratil, R-Leawood, House Minority Leader Anthony Hensley, D-Topeka and from the House, Feuerborn and House Minority Leader Paul Davis of Lawrence for the Democrats and Reps. Charles Roth of Salina and Don Hill of Emporia for the Republicans.
There was an important idea from conservatives brought up late in the session that found a toehold in the budget bill and which likely will take on more significance next year. Looking for ways to fund schools more without a tax increase, conservatives latched onto the idea of selling off between $175 million and $100 million in state properties by June 30, 2011. Many lawmakers agreed that idea had merit, but most agreed it would be difficult or impossible to inventory, appraise and sell off surplus state holdings fast enough to meet 2011 budget needs. Instead, a provision was included in the budget bill to create a committee to review state holdings for possible later sale.
Among some of the other things passed or not passed this session:
Medicaid reimbursement
The budget approved by the Legislature restored the 10 percent cut in reimbursements to the state’s Medicaid providers that was ordered Jan. 1 by the governor in response to the budget shortfall. The governor said from the outset that one of his top session priorities was restoring those cuts and the idea never had serious opposition.
Tobacco
Health Care Freedom Act
A proposed amendment to the state constitution sought by conservatives in response to federal health reform, stating that no Kansan could be “compelled” to have health insurance was rejected in the House and Senate.
Mental Health
After seeing their state aid cut by almost two-thirds - more than $20 million - over the past three years, the state’s community mental health centers were spared further cuts this session.
"The Feuerborn budget was better for community mental health centers than any of the others because it didn’t make any further cuts," said Kansas Mental Health Coalition Director Amy Campbell. "The others would have cut mental health by another $2 million or $3 million and would have all but eliminated MediKan-mental health," a program that benefits some of the state’s poorest and most troubled individuals.
Children
Nursing home tax
Lawmakers agreed to a new bed tax for nursing homes. Senate Substitute for Substitute for House Bill 2320 would tax licensed nursing homes to generate about $30 million which, in turn, would be used to draw down $56 million in additional federal Medicaid funding. The $86 million would be returned to the nursing homes based on the number of Medicaid residents in their care. The more Medicaid residents a home had, the more money it would receive.
Traffic safety
Social service agencies
Though there were some cuts to social service programs, generally they fared better than was expected at the beginning of the session, when most were slated for deeper rounds of cuts. Intense lobbying efforts by the disabled and their advocates helped, according to some lawmakers.
"I think we’ve heard a lot more from real people this year," said Rep. Jill Quigley, R-Lenexa, "because they’ve been hurt more than they’ve been hurt in the past. We’ve energized them."
"I think they (social service programs) fared about as well they possibly could given the financial situation we’re having to deal with," said Senate President Steve Morris, R-Hugoton. "I’m sure they (program advocates) are disappointed, but at least we managed to avoid even deeper cuts."
Key items:
Lawmakers will return on May 28 for Sine Die, the official, usually ceremonial close of the session.